President Donald Trump is threatening to sue the New York Times and CNN on reports that contradicted his statement that the recent North -American aerial attacks on Iran “forced” the country’s nuclear abilities.
The President’s legal team says that the two points of sale spread him by informing about a preliminary intelligence assessment that concluded that the strikes had only rested in the nuclear capabilities of Iran for a few months, according to an article from the Times earlier this week.
The report, quoting the evaluations of the Defense Intelligence Agency, came after Trump said that Trump said that US bombs had “forgotten” the Iranian nuclear installation in Fordow.
In a letter sent on Wednesday to the Gray Lady, Trump’s personal lawyer Alejandro Brito accused the slander document and demanded a retraction and apology.
The letter described the story of the Times as “false”, “defamatory” and “non -patriotic”. He stated that the document had hurt Trump’s reputation.
Brito called the military operation a “historical and resounding military success” that “unequivocally eliminated the nuclear abilities of Iran and brought peace to the region.”
In response, Times’ lawyer David McCraw rejected the demand.
“No retraction is needed,” he wrote. “There is no apology.
McCraw added that the article reported exactly what intelligence evaluated: “United States intelligence services issued a conclusive preliminary assessment that the attacks delayed the Iran’s nuclear program only a few months. This is what we reported.”
A spokesman for the CNN confirmed on Friday in the publication that the network had received a similar legal threat and also kept with its reports.
Legal threats took place after Trump exploited social media outlets, asking that journalists from both organizations were fired.
He also accused them of “demolishing” military staff in the United States. The Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, echoed Trump’s complaints at a television press conference on Thursday, criticizing the media but not disputing the existence of the intelligence report.
The publication has sought comments from the White House and Brito.
A spokesman sometimes refused to comment.
Although Trump has been frequently prominent to journalists, his latest threats are part of a wider and more aggressive legal strategy aimed at major media institutions.
These efforts often revolve around the consumer’s defamation or deception claims, and reflect their long -term attempt to issue the press as a political enemy.
Trump has launched or threatened numerous demands against news organizations in recent years. Among the highlights are a continuous demand of $ 20 billion against CBS News and his paramount company Palamount Global.
In this case, Trump accused CBS of deceptively editing a “60 minute” interview with then Vice President Kamala Harris to portray him with a negative light. Trump’s legal team claims that the segment deceived viewers in violation of Texas consumer protection laws.
CBS has denied the offenses and aims to dismiss the case by virtue of the protections of the first amendment, but it is expected that the settlement talks will be underway.
A mediator has proposed a resolution of $ 20 million, although Trump has not accepted the agreement, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Last December, ABC News, owned by Disney, established a complaint lawsuit filed by Trump after the anchor George Stephanopoulos stated that Trump had been responsible for violating writer E. Jean Carroll.
In fact, Trump was responsible for sexual abuse, not rape. ABC agreed to pay $ 15 million to Trump’s future presidential foundation and a million dollars in legal fees. The network also apologized.
Brito represented Trump in this case, as well as a demand by 2022 against CNN, which alleged that the network compared it to Adolf Hitler. This demand was dismissed by a federal judge in 2023 and is currently in appeal.
Trump has also sued in the record des Moines and the J. Ann Selzer poll, claiming that an Iowa survey of 2024 showing that Harris had been manipulated. This case was rejected due to lack of position and tests.
Although traditional complaint claims are difficult to win due to the sturdy protections of the first amendment, Trump’s legal team has increasingly inclined to consumer protection statutes, frameing the content of misleading media as a form of public deception.
Critics argue that the approach is designed to refresh press freedom and tie communication points in expensive litigation.
#Trump #threatens #sue #York #Times #CNN #reports #minims #Iran #strike #claims
Image Source : nypost.com